Ubuntu in a Founder's First Year? It is the kind of question that admits of two answers — a quick one and a true one. The quick answer is that Ubuntu means i am because we are. the southern african philosophy of shared humanity — the recognition that a person is a person through other people. The true answer takes longer, because Ubuntu is not really a concept; it is a way of seeing.
What Ubuntu Actually Means
Translators usually settle on something like: Ubuntu, in its most cited form, is captured in the Nguni phrase 'umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu' — a person is a person through other people. It names a worldview in which the self is not a fortress but a node in a network, and in which dignity, identity, and success are inherited from and accountable to community. It has shaped post-apartheid South Africa, modern leadership theory, and increasingly the way thoughtful organisations think about teams. It is a defensible translation. But translation is the surface. Ubuntu carries underneath it a set of assumptions — about what a person is, what owes what to whom, and what success even means — that the English sentence cannot deliver.
If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.African proverb
The Question This Post Is About
A composite story of an early-stage founder learning Ubuntu the hard way. The question is worth taking seriously, because Ubuntu is one of those concepts that loses its shape when handled carelessly — and recovers it as soon as the reader is willing to slow down and listen.
Take a small, ordinary case. A team of nine. A project that was supposed to take a quarter is now in its second. The manager has the option to find a single person to assign blame to and to move on. The Ubuntu reading offers a different question: what did we, as a team, fail to make possible for the person carrying this work? Every retrospective begins with the question of what the team made possible together, not who failed individually. The case is not unusual. The reading of it, in the spirit of Ubuntu, is.
A Second Angle
Notice what the case is not asking. It is not asking who is to blame. It is not asking how to make the situation more efficient. It is asking what Ubuntu would have us do here, with these particular people, in this particular knot. Every retrospective begins with the question of what the team made possible together, not who failed individually. The discipline of asking the Ubuntu question — instead of the efficiency question, or the blame question — is what changes a working life over years.
Where the Concept Resists
There is a real risk in romanticising Ubuntu. The Southern African (Bantu) traditions that produced it have always also produced internal critics — voices warning against the misuse of communal philosophy to demand conformity, to silence the young, to protect bad behaviour by elders. The honest defender of Ubuntu keeps those critics at the table.
What to Do With This
There is no certificate at the end of Ubuntu. There is only the slow accumulation of choices made differently — meetings shaped differently, relationships tended differently, decisions weighed differently. The reward is not visible. The cost is real. Over time the difference becomes a kind of life.
The full philosophy, as a book
The full philosophy of shared success — across leadership, conflict, accountability, and the digital age.
Read on Amazon