Most of what is written about Sankofa in English is wrong. Not maliciously — usually it is wrong because Sankofa resists translation, because the concept does not match neatly onto Western categories, because the writers are working with a sentence-long summary instead of a tradition. Sankofa and the New Hire? This essay is one attempt at a more careful answer.
What Sankofa Actually Means
Let me give the canonical definition first, then try to do a little better. Sankofa is an Akan word and a symbol — most often a bird with its head turned backward, holding an egg in its beak. The egg is the future; the head turned backward is the past. Together they teach a simple, demanding idea: it is not wrong, nor shameful, to go back and fetch what you forgot. The future cannot be built on amnesia. The canonical version is correct but tame. The full version of Sankofa is less polite, more demanding, and more interesting. It does not flatter the reader who has just discovered it.
If you don't know where you're going, return to where you came from.Akan
The Question This Post Is About
What happens when a new hire arrives in a Sankofa-shaped team. The question is worth taking seriously, because Sankofa is one of those concepts that loses its shape when handled carelessly — and recovers it as soon as the reader is willing to slow down and listen.
Take a small, ordinary case. A team of nine. A project that was supposed to take a quarter is now in its second. The manager has the option to find a single person to assign blame to and to move on. The Sankofa reading offers a different question: what did we, as a team, fail to make possible for the person carrying this work? Quarterly retrospectives are not separate from planning — they are the first half of it. The case is not unusual. The reading of it, in the spirit of Sankofa, is.
A Second Angle
Notice what the case is not asking. It is not asking who is to blame. It is not asking how to make the situation more efficient. It is asking what Sankofa would have us do here, with these particular people, in this particular knot. Quarterly retrospectives are not separate from planning — they are the first half of it. The discipline of asking the Sankofa question — instead of the efficiency question, or the blame question — is what changes a working life over years.
Where the Concept Resists
It would be dishonest to pretend Sankofa is uncomplicated. The concept can be — and has been — used to suppress dissent in the name of harmony, to extract unpaid labour from women in the name of community, and to soften criticism that should have been sharper. Any serious reading of Sankofa has to hold these uses in view. The concept survives the criticism. But it is not innocent.
What to Do With This
There is no certificate at the end of Sankofa. There is only the slow accumulation of choices made differently — meetings shaped differently, relationships tended differently, decisions weighed differently. The reward is not visible. The cost is real. Over time the difference becomes a kind of life.
The full philosophy, as a book
How to use your history, your failures, and your traditions as fuel rather than baggage.
Read on Amazon